Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 11:26:25 GMT 5.5
A it cannot be argued that the regulation of detention and preventive arrest in the case of minors in any way affects the principle of the legality of punishment. . The Peoples Advocate considers that the provisions of art. para. and of art. of the Criminal Procedure Code are constitutional. It shows that the criticized legal provisions must be correlated with those of art. of the Criminal Code which stipulates that a custodial educational measure may be taken against a minor who at the time of the crime was between and years old if he committed another.
Crime for which an educational measure was applied which was executed or Country Email List the execution of which began before the commission of the offense for which he is being judged or when the punishment provided by law for the offense committed is imprisonment of years or more or life imprisonment. Moreover the European Court of Human Rights ruled in its jurisprudence for example by the Judgment of June pronounced in the Wemhoff Case against Germany that the assessment of the reasonable limits of a provisional detention is done taking into account the concrete circumstances of each cases to see to what extent there are precise.
Indications regarding the jeopardy of a real public interest and which without prejudice to the presumption of innocence has a greater weight than that of the general rule of trial in a state of freedom. In conclusion the Peoples Advocate shows that the court is obliged to ensure a fair balance between the measure of deprivation of liberty and the public interest of protecting citizens against both from the manner of committing the act regarding which there are indications that took place with the defendants participation as well as from its consequences. . The presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament did not communicate their views on.
Crime for which an educational measure was applied which was executed or Country Email List the execution of which began before the commission of the offense for which he is being judged or when the punishment provided by law for the offense committed is imprisonment of years or more or life imprisonment. Moreover the European Court of Human Rights ruled in its jurisprudence for example by the Judgment of June pronounced in the Wemhoff Case against Germany that the assessment of the reasonable limits of a provisional detention is done taking into account the concrete circumstances of each cases to see to what extent there are precise.
Indications regarding the jeopardy of a real public interest and which without prejudice to the presumption of innocence has a greater weight than that of the general rule of trial in a state of freedom. In conclusion the Peoples Advocate shows that the court is obliged to ensure a fair balance between the measure of deprivation of liberty and the public interest of protecting citizens against both from the manner of committing the act regarding which there are indications that took place with the defendants participation as well as from its consequences. . The presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament did not communicate their views on.